• PiperForum.com is a vibrant community of Piper owners and pilots. Our over 1,500+ active members use Piper Forum to swap technical knowledge, plan meetups and sell planes/parts. We host technical knowledge of general aviation topics and specific topics on J3-Cubs, Cherokees, Comanches, Pacers and more. In addition to an instant community of pilots for you, PiperForum.com is a library of technical topics, airplane builds, images, technical manuals, technical documents and more.

    Access to PiperForum.com is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of Piper knowledge.

    Click Here to Become a Subscribing Member and Access PiperForum.com in Full!

TTAF versus aircraft age

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

rspall

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
23
Reaction score
2

With TTAF identical, is a younger aluminum (not composite)aircraft safer than an older one. I don't care about maintenance costs, as I amguessing a younger aircraft is probably cheaper to maintain. I am basicallytrying to understand how age versus TTAF affects safety, i.e. structuralintegrity as control lines, etc get inspected / replaced annually.

For example, how does a 1995 Piper Arrow III with TTAF 3500 compare (structural safety wise) with a 1978 model with same TTAF. For comparison, neither have corrosion, no outstanding AD's etc.

I guess I am asking what causes aircraft to structurally fail, TTAF or age?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top