• PiperForum.com is a vibrant community of Piper owners and pilots. Our over 1,500+ active members use Piper Forum to swap technical knowledge, plan meetups and sell planes/parts. We host technical knowledge of general aviation topics and specific topics on J3-Cubs, Cherokees, Comanches, Pacers and more. In addition to an instant community of pilots for you, PiperForum.com is a library of technical topics, airplane builds, images, technical manuals, technical documents and more.

    Access to PiperForum.com is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of Piper knowledge.

    Click Here to Become a Subscribing Member and Access PiperForum.com in Full!

Sad accident

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Tweety

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2011
Messages
18,884
Reaction score
6,726
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news...ieuport-severely-damaged-in-landing-accident/
...but this adds to the controversy of whether these historic aircraft should be flown or kept as museum pieces. To someone who loves to see these aircraft in their proper element, I feel the same about museum poeces as an ornathologist feeld about caged birsd. OTOH, it's possible to build authentic replicas, Peter Jackson of LOTR fame has a whole stable of them, and even rotary engines aren't in short supply. Given their construction with the absence of difficult to reproduce forgings, it's even possible to build a full-size replica of a rotary engine. And due to the flying characteristics of early aircraft, the abomination of fitting them with a modern engine can be avoided.

Let the debate begin: Museum pieces of flying originals?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top